Some people believed that reality rap has done much to our world; hence our society has improved. Laws are stated for music censorship. Some also think that rap censorship is actually wrong; there are cases, songs, and interview to prove them. Lots of people think that rap music promotes violence and that it’s damaging to the people. While a lot of emphasis is put on the detrimental effects of a few rap music, there’s little acknowledgment of rap’s positive cultural contribution and social activism.
Reality rap shouldn’t be censored because everybody has the right to their freedom of speech, which is in Section 2 of Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Rappers express thoughts and the world is after them. According to them, it’s freedom of choice, and that’s exactly what America is supposed to be about. It seems that priorities are just in the wrong order. For these people, censoring rap is unlawful. Rap artists have every legal right to communicate themselves in in whatever way they like to. Rap music has been good to the society. Rap music has informed people about black culture. Individuals always discover what is the bad aspect of rap through the mass media. They never learn what good it does.
Rap is actually the top selling type of music today. Rap has brought individuals a brand new sense of pride and a brand new form of self expression. Rap has brought black kids and white kids closer together. As a result of rap, white kids are gaining a better understanding and a new respect for black culture. Rap has done nothing but bring men and women together. It’s people who do not understand the music or the culture which are creating problems. Musicians, recording companies and fans are all concerned with the issue of music censorship. These people are pitted against the government officials and community organizations who are seeking to eliminate what’s considered to be obscenity in popular music. Issues arise in seeking an adequate meaning of obscenity as it pertains to art.
The Supreme Court definition for obscenity in art was reached in the 1973 case entitled Miller versus California. In that particular case, it was decided that obscenity is a community problem and that it should be determined on the basis of local, rather than federal, standards. Also, the Supreme Court decided that, in order for a product to be obscene, it must be patently offensive and it also should appeal to prurient interests and lack serious artistic value. Controversies surface in looking for a definition for what makes up artistic merit.
Although reality rap is gaining bad reputation due to the rappers’ lifestyle, there are rappers who don’t utilize profanity and violence in their lyrics, such as Will Smith. Good rap does not have to be vulgar. Followers observe how much of a good role model Will Smith is with his good lyrics. If one decides to make negative music, you have a choice to listen to it, or otherwise. You likewise have a choice between mimicking the lyrics, or not. Whatever you do is under your discretion.